laurbits

I'm a comic artist w/ a love for excellent stories in the form of movies, TV shows, musicals, manga, and animation.

This is my virtual scrapbook and reblog tumblr. Bits and pieces of the internet and the occasional ramble about stuff I love.

[Polterguys Comic blog] [Art blog] [Fandom blog]

Other places to find me:
website
deviantart
twitter
facebook

FAVORITE TAGS:
Advice / Resources / Animation / Writing / Life

Recent Tweets @laurbits
Posts tagged "writing"
Most of us agree that these are dark times, and stupid ones, but do we need fiction that does nothing but dramatize how dark and stupid everything is? In dark times, the definition of good art would seem to be art that locates and applies CPR to those elements of what’s human and magical that still live and glow despite the times’ darkness. Really good fiction could have as dark a worldview as it wished, but it’d find a way both to depict this world and to illuminate the possibilities for being alive and human in it.
David Foster Wallace (via wordpainting)

(via felaxx)

Of course, there are those critics—New York critics as a rule—who say, Well, Maya Angelou has a new book out and of course it’s good but then she’s a natural writer. Those are the ones I want to grab by the throat and wrestle to the floor because it takes me forever to get it to sing. I work at the language.
Maya Angelou, in an interview for The Paris Review (via yeahwriters)

(via felaxx)

Asker Anonymous Asks:
If you want diverse books, write them. That's it.
laurbits laurbits Said:

kateelliottsff:

malindalo:

elloellenoh:

imjusthereforthelions:

weneeddiversebooks:

alisonroseishere:

weneeddiversebooks:

The point of this campaign is that there are some wonderful diverse books that are published but that don’t sell. Because they don’t sell, they don’t stay in the shelves long. Because they don’t stay in the shelves long, they don’t earn out (meaning they don’t recoup the small advance paid to the authors). Because they don’t earn out, publishers consider them a loss and the authors can’t publish another book. Because they can’t publish another book, other diverse authors also don’t get published.

This is an oversimplification of a complicated problem. But to say if you want them just write them is just plain wrong. It’s like making a comment on a subject you know nothing about. Please educate yourself first.

We need diverse books to do well in the marketplace so that they can STAY in the marketplace and more people can read them.

FFS, not everyone is a writer! Just because I like to read doesn’t mean I can write a fucking novel. I HATE this “just write them” crap because it’s based on this weird idea that writing a book is no big thing, just dash one off this afternoon, like it was a fucking grocery list, and that any random person can sit down and write fiction.

No. I’m a READER. I’m not a writer. But I’m a reader who wants a wide array of authors, characters and subjects to choose from, so I want diversity to be supported and boosted and encouraged and spotlit. The problem is not that there isn’t diversity among authors or books, it’s that this diversity is ignored or neglected or dismissed in favor of the status quo. And we shouldn’t all have to suddenly, magically, become novelists in order to change that.

Reblogging for commentary!!

Nevertheless, if you write books and want diverse books? Write diverse books.

We are writing them. Many of us are. This is not the point. The point is - if you want diverse books BUY THEM!! BORROW THEM FROM THE LIBRARY!!! SUPPORT THEM!!! And then maybe more authors can write more diverse books.

I often hear this reaction to “we need diverse books” discussions, that is, “so why don’t you write them?” The thing is, not only are not all readers writers, the act of reading a book is significantly, hugely different from writing a book.

I have indeed written the books that I wanted to read, but after doing that several times, I’ve realized that writing them is nothing at all like reading a book that I want to read. Writing a book is WORK; work that I love. It’s about making thousands of decisions about words, plots, and characters. It’s about thinking endlessly about what you’re doing, and figuring out how to do it in a way that translates to readers. It is basically the opposite of reading, because reading a book is about escaping into another world that someone else created. It’s about losing yourself in that world; it’s about experiencing something outside yourself and yet feeling like it’s in your head. Reading should feel like the opposite of work.

Reading and writing are two vastly different experiences.

Also, I’d say that writing is driven by very different needs than reading is. As a writer, I’m driven to tell stories that mean something to me, but the meaning I’m unpacking through my writing is totally unrelated to the meaning I’m looking for in my reading. For example, when I decide to tell a story, I tell it because it hits some kind of gut-level desire in me to express myself in that particular way. In contrast, when I decide to read a story, I do it for a variety of reasons: I want to read a thriller on the airplane; I want to read a literary novel to polish my craft; I want to escape in a sci-fi adventure full of romance. These reasons feel very different, for me, than the reasons I want to write something.

So, I’m going on forever but the point is: reading and writing are different things.

Also, I can read many more books a year than I can write. So we need more diverse books.

vastderp:

mercurialmalcontent:

vastderp:

actually my biggest thing is couples who are so comfortable and open with each other that there is literally no drama about their relationship and no question that they will ever break up

i like boring marrieds

Asker redcurlygurl Asks:
Maggie, I just found reviews of your books on Goodreads, and I was absolutely appalled at the negative reviews, and then slightly pleased I had read them. The people who said you have slow plots were probably looking for the explosions and sex they see on TV. I am happy I read those reviews because I have a more firm argument as to why I love your writing: you create realistic characters with realistic (disguised) problems. Your sentences sing and your words breathe. So, brava. Write on.
laurbits laurbits Said:

maggie-stiefvater:

oneacquaintedwiththenight:

maggie-stiefvater:

First of all, thanks! I’m revoltingly pleased that you like my writing. I know you didn’t ask a question about reviews, but I’m going to answer a question about them anyway, because I have a few related asks in my inbox.

I once heard that writers should ignore one star reviews and five star reviews, because they’re both lies.

I actually think they’re both true. They are the purest, most unchecked reaction to a novel. Right before my first novel came out, I went onto Goodreads and I read both the good and bad reviews for several of my favorite novels. I wanted to remind myself that if my favorite novels to read didn’t appeal to everyone, surely mine that I’d written wouldn’t either. The thing I realized about the one star and five star reviews, though, was that they often said the same thing. The five star would praise the anti-hero narrator; the one star would harpoon the unlikable narrator. The five star would admire the thorough exploration of the mother’s backstory; the one star would ask why the book had to slow for someone as unimportant as the mother character. The five star would praise the energetic pace; the one star would complain that there was no description.

Same book, different tastes. I do think a book can be done badly, sure. But  even a book done very well can’t please everyone. And the more specific a book is, the more polarized the reviews are.

I figured out then that my goal isn’t to write a book that everyone likes. It’s to write a book that some people love — which means some people are also going to hate it. The more passionate my reviews get, good and bad, the happier I am.

So even though you didn’t ask a question, I’m going to answer one for aspiring writers: learn to love your reviews of all stripes. Learn how to read them for the true, objective bits, and decide for yourself if those bits match the kind of novel you’re trying to write.

I want to translate this entire post about reviews into a post about relating to people. It’s a wonderful perspective on the feedback you get as a writer, but I think it applies to the feedback you get as a human being. You can almost substitute “book” with “person” and “write a book” with “be a person.”

A book that tries to pleases everyone will fail and won’t find readers who will really connect with it. A person who tries to please everyone will fail and won’t find people who will really connect with her.

I believe in being specific. Not controversial for controversy’s sake, but specific: about what you like and don’t like, what you want and don’t want, what you’re interested in and what you care about. It’s hard to be happy without being specific, not least of all because you don’t find your people by being vague.

reblogging because this, yes, yes, yes, definitely.

Also, it doesn’t just apply to people, it applies to The Everything. Specific versus general is the way to both satisfying success and memorable failure. You just have to be willing to face the latter to get the former.

Asker Anonymous Asks:
I have a weird question. I was looking at the characters for a story of mine, and realized almost all the main characters (antagonists excluded) were in some way LGBT. I worry about what this might to do the story, but at the same time, it's gotten to the point where these characters don't feel right if I imagine them heterosexual. Am I making a big deal out of nothing, or should I consider reevaluating my characters?
laurbits laurbits Said:

olgaulanova:

Oof. Here it is. My #1 writing block. 

maxkirin:

Hello, dear anon~

I have said in the past that we as writers don’t come up with stories. We find them, we stumble upon them. This is why, to be honest, writing advice has very little to do with writing— and a whole lot to do with the writer.

As a writer you have one job, and that is to: be true to the story. You found it. It’s yours. And you must be true to it, because doing otherwise is not only betraying the story— but yourself.

Now that I put that in very nice words, I will say them again a little bluntly— because I’ve gotten questions similar to this in the past, and I want to make sure everyone gets the message.

GET OUT OF THE WAY OF YOUR STORY.

Are you afraid people will judge you because of your writing? Now, I don’t mean to be rude, but that doesn’t sound like it’s a problem with the story, it sounds like its a problem with you. I’ve gotten dozens (upon dozens) of messages from people who are writing a story they feel may be offensive, or that deals with horrible things, and they doubt the story because they’re afraid of what would come their way.

But that’s not your job.

Your job is to be true to the story. Check-in your doubts, and fears, at the door and do your job, anon. And do not ever think for one second that you have the power to ‘change’ the story— because you didn’t make it, you found it, and if you try to change it at all it will look as convincing as a dinosaur fossil pasted together with duct tape. It will not look right, I promise you. I have learned this the hard way.

Again, your job is to be true to the story. To tell it as true as it could possibly be— and that means getting out of the way.

Are you afraid people will judge you because of your writing?

This has been the most challenging, and the most amazing part of writing. I got to work through a large part of that fear, and I’m looking forward to moving past all of it down the road. Getting all of the mental garbage out of the way and no longer crippling my creativity with judgement. It’s gonna be a glorious thing! :)

What you do is write letters to yourself. Literally. ‘Dear David, my name is Timothy Cavendish, I’m in my sixties, we’ve met once before few years ago when you wrote Ghostwritten. Person I love most in the world is this. What I’m afraid most of in the world is this. What I think about god, money, sex, work is this, this, this and this.’ You cover about twenty basis and you use their language. Not my language because they’re writing a letter to me. Do that two or three times and they’re kind of real enough to then stand on their own feet and talk. That’s it.

My life in a nutshell: David Mitchell on How to Create Characters 

Basis? That’s got to be a transcription error. Still: awesome.

(via joehillsthrills)

(via joehillsthrills)

olgaulanova:

Characterization in 3 seconds ↑
One of the great things about Haikyuu!! is that all the characters have distinct personalities. They’re not just tired old stereotypes of macho dudes who want to play sports. Whenever something happens they all have emotional reactions, and they react in a unique way that is appropriate to their character — down to how they catch treats thrown at them. :D I just love this little bit of humanity. These are the things that breathe life into characters.
And it adds immense enjoyment to what is on the surface just another sports anime. It could’ve been just watching dudes “do the thing and win the points,” and want to become #1 at volleyball blah blah. While they do all want to play v-ball and be the best, they have unique motivations for doing so. And they have unique ways of going about that goal. No character is interchangeable, and the sport is just a vehicle for their personal evolution. (Character arcs in a shonen anime, whuuuttt)
And that makes for a fine show, cause I firmly believe best stories are not about events/sports/things, they’re about people.
Also the animation is consistently good, and pretty sweet in some parts! :D 

YES. ALL THIS. Watch Haikyuu, guys. It is QUALITY. 

olgaulanova:

Characterization in 3 seconds 

One of the great things about Haikyuu!! is that all the characters have distinct personalities. They’re not just tired old stereotypes of macho dudes who want to play sports. Whenever something happens they all have emotional reactions, and they react in a unique way that is appropriate to their character — down to how they catch treats thrown at them. :D I just love this little bit of humanity. These are the things that breathe life into characters.

And it adds immense enjoyment to what is on the surface just another sports anime. It could’ve been just watching dudes “do the thing and win the points,” and want to become #1 at volleyball blah blah. While they do all want to play v-ball and be the best, they have unique motivations for doing so. And they have unique ways of going about that goal. No character is interchangeable, and the sport is just a vehicle for their personal evolution. (Character arcs in a shonen anime, whuuuttt)

And that makes for a fine show, cause I firmly believe best stories are not about events/sports/things, they’re about people.

Also the animation is consistently good, and pretty sweet in some parts! :D 

YES. ALL THIS. Watch Haikyuu, guys. It is QUALITY. 

explore-blog:

Dare to Disturb the Universe – a long-lost, now found fantastic 1983 lecture by Madeleine L’Engle on creativity, censorship, writing, and the duty of children’s books 

You read something which you thought only happened to you, and you discover that it happened 100 years ago to Dostoyevsky. This is a very great liberation for the suffering, struggling person, who always thinks that he is alone. This is why art is important. Art would not be important if life were not important, and life is important.
James Baldwin, Conversations with James Baldwin (via bookshavepores)

(via tildrum)